| 01AI and OSH boundaries in manufacturing | Understand how AI may assist safety documentation and analysis while keeping hazard decisions, controls and escalation with authorised people. | - Distinguish drafting, sorting and summarising from safety decisions.
- Recognise personal, medical, confidential and proprietary data risks.
- Map each AI-assisted task to a responsible reviewer and escalation route.
| Classify a fictional factory safety query and draft output as useful assistance, unsupported inference or a decision requiring an authorised safety owner; record the verification needed for each item. |
|---|
| 02Hazard identification and risk-register support | Structure workplace observations so a competent safety owner can review hazards, exposures, existing controls and unanswered questions. | - Capture task, location, people exposed and evidence without embellishment.
- Separate existing controls, proposed actions and uncertain information.
- Cross-check any draft against the organisation's approved risk-assessment method.
| Convert sanitised fictional walkabout notes from a production and warehouse area into a draft hazard log, then highlight missing evidence and questions for the safety representative. |
|---|
| 03Incident and near-miss documentation | Organise reported information into a traceable, neutral working draft without deciding cause, blame, liability or corrective action approval. | - Preserve chronology, source references and uncertainty in the record.
- Separate observed facts from hypotheses and witness follow-up.
- Draft respectful questions and escalation notes for the investigation owner.
| Use a fictional near-miss note to build a timeline, evidence list and open-question set; remove invented details and mark every conclusion that requires authorised investigation. |
|---|
| 04Safe work instructions and toolbox communication | Create clearer draft safety communication from approved procedures without changing controlled requirements or bypassing document approval. | - Simplify approved wording while preserving required controls and warnings.
- Adapt a message for operators, maintenance staff or contractors.
- Flag version, terminology and translation questions for the document owner.
| Prepare a draft toolbox talk from a sanitised approved-procedure excerpt, compare it line by line with the source and mark any wording that needs owner approval before use. |
|---|
| 05Inspections, actions and corrective follow-up | Make inspection observations and action tracking easier to review while avoiding unsupported closure, priority or compliance conclusions. | - Link each observation to its record, location and responsible owner.
- Distinguish an action status shown in the source from an AI inference.
- Prepare evidence requests and escalation prompts for unresolved items.
| Work from a mock machine-area inspection tracker to draft a follow-up list, validate each owner and status against the source, and flag actions that cannot be marked closed. |
|---|
| 06High-risk work, contractors and site coordination | Support pre-job communication and handoffs for maintenance, contractor, warehouse and logistics activities without authorising work or replacing site controls. | - Structure pre-start questions, required records and named approval points.
- Surface missing handover details for permits, isolation or site access processes.
- Keep contractor, supervisor and safety-owner responsibilities explicit.
| Build a fictional pre-start coordination brief for contractor maintenance near a production area, then identify missing approvals and information that must be confirmed before work. |
|---|
| 07OSH metrics and management reporting | Summarise defined safety information for management review while preserving source periods, limitations and the distinction between correlation and cause. | - State the source, scope and time period for every reported measure.
- Separate counts, trends, observations and proposed questions.
- Avoid causal claims or performance judgments not supported by approved evidence.
| Create a draft monthly OSH review from fictional inspection, training and near-miss records, then annotate assumptions, missing data and questions for management and safety-owner validation. |
|---|
| 08Governance, verification and pilot planning | Design a small, reviewable AI-assisted OSH use case with clear data boundaries, human approval and reference checks. | - Define permitted data, reviewer roles, approval steps and escalation triggers.
- Choose a low-risk documentation task and agree evaluation questions.
- Check current official sources and internal procedures before operational use.
| Draft a pilot brief for organising sanitised inspection follow-up, including scope, exclusions, responsible reviewer, verification checklist, feedback method and a stop condition. |
|---|